Status of i10n calls on KDE4

[Chusslove Illich]

> [: Krzysztof Lichota :]
> Why JavaScript? Has there been any further discussions apart from what
> has been talked about on kde-i18n-doc?

In the first discussion about this on k-c-d (in September 2005, some time 
after the big discussion on kde-i18n-doc), people pointed to KJS being an 
excellent candidate, because it is lightweight and comes free of external 
dependencies. And since scripting should be a rare thing, the choice of 
language shouldn't matter that much.

But then I still have to look into this JavaScript stuff, which I somehow 
do not find interesting by itself. So I don't know whether to be happy or 
sad if kdecore dependency on kjsembed is not to be allowed -- then an 
external interpreter would be one of optional dependencies of kdelibs (it 
needs not be present, as any scripted message would have its "boring" 
counterpart).

-- 
Chusslove Illich (Часлав Илић)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20061228/e1f46e31/attachment.sig>