Proposal: New module "kdepimlibs"

[Cornelius Schumacher]

On Tuesday 25 April 2006 13:43, Volker Krause wrote:
>
> Indeed, but there might be a problem though: kdgantt is licensed similar to
> Qt (GPL + commercial license), which is incompatible with the kdelibs
> license policy (which we would like to apply for kdepimlibs as well).
>
> So either kdgantt has to stay out or we need a diffrent/extended license
> policy for kdepimlibs.

Hm, that's a tough problem. It's the questions how much our LGPL policy is 
worth. Who would use a LGPL library, but wouldn't use a GPL one? Would these 
people buy a commercial license of kdgantt? Does this kind of developer even 
exist?

In order to have a clean non-GPL lib module we probably have to leave out 
kdgantt for now.

-- 
Cornelius Schumacher <schumacher at kde.org>