stubbing KStartupInfo -- win32 feedback? (was Re: A little review of kdecore & kdeui)
rangerrick at gmail.com
Tue Apr 11 17:28:42 BST 2006
On 4/10/06, Lubos Lunak <l.lunak at suse.cz> wrote:
> Non-X11 platforms should implement their own KStartupInfo, with most
> functions being no-op I'd presume. Is there any problem with that?
I started doing this, but realized I'd be re-implementing half of the
"convenience" bits that are already in kstartupinfo.cpp, so I ended up
just #ifdef'ing it instead. I'd like some feedback from you and maybe
anyone involved in the win32 port before I commit it, though.
It basically chops out anywhere there are actual KXmessages passed
around, but leaves things otherwise alone, including the
Could KXmessages perhaps be replaced by something qt-based
(signals/slots or some other IPC mechanism)? Or is it enough to just
have the apps think they're able to track this basic state and be done
with it for now?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 8267 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the kde-core-devel