A little review of kdecore & kdeui
kevin.krammer at gmx.at
Fri Apr 7 18:35:44 BST 2006
On Friday 07 April 2006 16:15, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday 06 April 2006 23:11, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 April 2006 15:07, David Faure wrote:
> > > > rollback into Qt
> > > > ================
> > > > KActiveLabel
> > >
> > > LOL. How will Qt call kfmclient, exactly?
> > Qt can call xdg-open, see
> > http://portland.freedesktop.org/wiki/TaskOpenURL
> while i'm a fan of the portland stuff, does it make sense to have kde rely
> on it? (serious question, not a rhetorical one)
Qt would rely on it, we have to provide it.
Though IMHO it would rather use the DAPI call or something equivalent than to
rely on an external executable.
Or, depending if at least Qt/X11 will have D-Bus as a dependency
(accessibility bridge maybe?) I'd suggest we have kded provide a launcher
interface through it
Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer at gmx.at>
Qt/KDE Developer, Debian User
Moderator: www.mrunix.de (German), www.qtcentre.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the kde-core-devel