Revisiting the question of a kdebase branch
Olivier Goffart
ogoffart at kde.org
Sat Apr 1 16:53:05 BST 2006
Le Samedi 1 Avril 2006 14:29, Hamish Rodda a écrit :
> Rather than have a kdebase snapshot, what I'm suggesting is to have a
> kdebase-bleedingedge branch which people may commit their ports against.
> When a new kdelibs snapshot is made, kdebase trunk can (optionally) be
> updated with some changes in the bleedingedge branch. A few days after the
> snapshot, the bleedingedge branch should be overwritten with kdebase trunk,
> and so the cycle continues.
I agree.
Anyway, I think the policy is that everyone can create branch if they want.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060401/1eeb1035/attachment.sig>
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list