KURL problem

[Andras Mantia]

On Tuesday 27 September 2005 14:57, David Faure wrote:
> However the real question is: do you remember why you asked for
> whether "%E1.foo" was a valid URL? It is parsed by the current KURL,
> but Thiago tells me that this url doesn't have a defined
> interpretation.

I was trying to find the reason in my mail archives, but I couldn't (I 
don't have the mails before 2004). But I believe it was something 
related to accented characters in filenames.

Andras

-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050927/ed70e91d/attachment.sig>