Fwd: Re: Switching to QtTestLib for unit tests

[Brad Hards]

On Thursday 08 September 2005 19:27 pm, David Faure wrote:
> QCA is a special case - it's in kdesupport at the moment, but is it
> supposed to stay there in the long run?
kdesupport is the intended long-term home. I can live with needing to have 
QtTestLib already installed for the QCA tests though. When it comes down to 
it, where it lives is about 1% of the issue. We've agreed on the tools, and 
we've agreed on the need for high levels of test coverage - those are the 
things that are important.

Brad
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050908/04c5acab/attachment.sig>