Qt4 constructors

[Kuba Ober]

On Tuesday 06 September 2005 06:45, Harri Porten wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Benjamin Meyer wrote:
> > yes, setObjectName() is a lot nicer in that regard.  Reading the code
> > you know exactly what it is doing rather then questioning if it is the
> > caption, text or object name.
>
> The problem is that setObjectName() will hardly get used. And for testing
> and scripting the lack of unique object names is really bad. 

Sure. But that doesn't imply that mere presence of an argument suddenly makes 
it used or useful.

Cheers, Kuba