[RFC] Possible KView Maintainership
boud at valdyas.org
Tue Oct 25 10:22:49 BST 2005
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 11:06, Jakob Petsovits wrote:
> On Monday 24 October 2005 18:17, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
> > As I said, features that work better in more advanced applications are
> > feature bloat -- an image viewer doesn't need to be able to modify and
> > save images.
> An image viewer needs to turn images by 90 degrees and save them.
> The Windows image viewer does it, all proper image viewers do it,
> and it's quite a necessity for newly taken photos.
And of course it should do that using exif, if present.
> Other than that, I also don't think that an image viewer should be having
> more editor capabilities, just have an option to open the image in your
> favorite bitmap editor.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the kde-core-devel