klingens at kde.org
Mon Oct 10 15:02:21 BST 2005
On Monday 10 October 2005 14:15, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> hmm, how about that:
> class QAbstractProcess : public QIODevice;
> class QProcess : public QAbstractProcess;
> class KExtProcess : public QAbstractProcess;
> i didn't really think it through; it's just an idea. i guess that would
> be qt5 anyway.
Sounds like overkill. If I can make [QK]ExtProcess binary compatible with the
'normal' classes it would be nice, but it's not a goal as it's almost
certainly not even possible. The goal is source compatibility, and possibly
subclassing QIODevice, but subclassing anything below the IO device seems
like a lot of work with little benefit to me.
> > If there's anything interesting or revolutionary, please do inform me.
> > Also I would like to receive a heads-up when you think the K4Process
> > API starts stabilizing,
More information about the kde-core-devel