KAction port: do we need to support multiple shortcuts per action?
zander at kde.org
Tue Nov 29 16:44:33 GMT 2005
Thanks for the clarification; I kind of expected there to be a mixup since
I (knowing a bit or two about usability) have a really hard time coming
up with reasons of why accessing the same thing in two different,
non-conflicting manners is a usability issue.
Maybe the trolls found some reasons that I can't think of, but I can think
of a dozen reasons why having 2 shortcuts leading to the same action (or
even 4, as there apparently are) is usefull for usability.
Think of things like 'ctrl-=' and 'ctrl-+' being used to allow a logical
key for font-enlargement but do not force the user to use shift.
I'd say that KDE4 should indeed try to keep multiple shortcuts per action.
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 17:02, Hamish Rodda wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 November 2005 02:52, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > Could you explain more clearly what 'multiple shortcuts' is?
> > I can imagine 2 things;
> > * Having more then one complete shortcut per action.
> This is what I meant. In KDE, this is provided by KShortcut, which can
> have up to 4 separate key sequences (although it seems only 2 are
> supported by the config gui). In KDE3, KAction allows any of the
> sequences to activate the same action. If we were to use QAction as a
> base for KAction in KDE4, to keep this feature we (or Trolltech) would
> have to add multiple sequence support.
> > * Having to press multiple keysequences per shortcut. (emacs style)
> Key sequences are supported (by QKeySequence).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the kde-core-devel