KDateTime: next iteration

[Brad Hards]

On Tuesday 29 November 2005 21:07 pm, Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 November 2005 10:34, Brad Hards wrote:
> > Any thoughts about handling leap seconds?
>
> Where do you see the need?
I am interested in conversion between GPS time and UTC, however I am sure that 
there are a lot of people who care about identifying activities to within a  
second (security logging, astronomy, scientific experiment control, and 
almost certainly more)

> (Also the problem is QTime, which does not support 60 and 61 seconds.)
I haven't looked at the detail, I was just querying about whether there was 
any intention to support it, and if so, how. If it is an implementation limit 
that there is no support for leap seconds, that is probably worth 
documenting.

Brad
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20051129/44c719ba/attachment.sig>