[RFC] KConfigBase v KConfig

[Stephan Kulow]

Am Freitag, 4. November 2005 13:44 schrieb Thomas Braxton:
> Does anyone have any problems with changing almost all KConfig*'s to
> KConfigBase*'s? It seems to me that there are very few places you *really*
> need to know if it's a KConfig or not.

The Base* is an internal implementation detail. No reason to spread it. What 
you _could_ think abut is renaming the classes, but even that I see not of 
any gain. What gain do you promise yourself?

Greetings, Stephan