Anne-Marie Mahfouf annemarie.mahfouf at free.fr
Sun May 22 15:05:11 BST 2005

Le 21 Mai 2005 18:45, Albert Astals Cid a écrit :
> Currently in kdereview we have knetworkconf, ksynaptics and viki. IIRC they
> have been there for almost 2 months and IMHO this is breaking the purpose
> of kdereview, that is giving some review to programs. So that programs
> should be either approved to be "stable and kde compilant" and decide with
> the author if they have to go to any kde module or to some extragear or
> either push them back to the playground.
> What do you think? Should we put a hard maximum time, for example 2 weeks,
> for projects to stay in kdereview?
> Albert
I just would like to say that any app in kdereview should have a complete 
handbook covering all features of the application as well as QWhatsThis help.
Maybe a usability feedback as well?
The author also has to agree to maintain it (at least for a while). 

If we agree on some basics, I can write a README that we can put in each 


More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list