panel related classes in kdeui
amantia at kde.org
Tue May 10 10:31:58 BST 2005
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 11:28, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> Am Dienstag 10 Mai 2005 00:06 schrieb Richard Smith:
> > On Monday 09 May 2005 18:43, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > > On Monday 09 May 2005 20:16, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > > This is my "official" request for the OK to do this. what say
> > > > ye? =)
> > >
> > > This would mean that kdetv will depend on kdebase, which I'm not
> > > sure it is a good idea.
> > I think Aaron's suggestion is a good one. This will mean that the
> > part of kdetv which interfaces with kicker will depend on
> > libkicker, which to me seems sane and sensible. And a smaller
> > libkdeui is no bad thing.
> Right. And we have other things that depend on kdebase already. E.g.
That's a little bit different as kdeaddons contains addons for a number
of applications from all around KDE. In this case a third party
application will be forced to depend on kdebase. Sure, the question
about if this is good or not should be answered by the kdetv
maintainer. I think that it is not good, especiallt for those wanting
to run kdetv, but using a different DE as their main desktop.
So let's ask Dirk Ziegelmeier (kdetv maintainer) about if he is OK or
not to depend on kdebase.
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the kde-core-devel