Cervisia licensing: moving forward?

[Thiago Macieira]

Ben Burton wrote:
>Thiago has written with the following instructions:
>> If you people are ok with a dual license, then please place notices in
>> all your files that the file is dual-licensed.
>>
>> Only the copyright holder can do that. Commit the changes to
>> KDE_3_3_BRANCH, HEAD and ask Coolo for instructions on KDE_3_4_BRANCH.

Ok, don't take my advice as a rule. That was just what would be 
preferrable. But if it is very difficult to make the commit, and we've 
already seen the copyright holders voice their opinion, I think it is ok 
if someone else changes the license. You can always reference the public 
URL to the message in the commit log.

I am not a lawyer, though.

BTW, the 3.4 branch instructions were necessary at the time because it was 
frozen for commits. It is no longer so.

-- 
  Thiago Macieira  -  thiago (AT) macieira (DOT) info
    PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
    E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358

2. Tó cennan his weorc gearu, ymbe se circolwyrde, wearð se cægbord and se 
leohtspeccabord, and þa mýs cómon lator. On þone dæg, he hine reste.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050327/68b4cc99/attachment.sig>