[patch] Compile failures on amd64/gcc 4.0
Mickael Marchand
marchand at kde.org
Sun Jan 23 22:37:43 GMT 2005
Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Mickael Marchand wrote:
>
>>+ int bits = (ptrdiff_t)syms->modsyms[res]-1;
>
>
> Why don't you declare those variables as ptrdiff_t as well?
>
> gcc may not display a warning about loss of precision, but it will happen
> nonetheless.
hmm ok,
like this ?
Cheers,
Mik
-------------- next part --------------
Index: keytrans.cpp
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/kde/kdebase/konsole/konsole/keytrans.cpp,v
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -u -3 -p -r1.48 keytrans.cpp
--- keytrans.cpp 22 Sep 2004 20:02:16 -0000 1.48
+++ keytrans.cpp 23 Jan 2005 22:36:02 -0000
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ Loop:
//printf("line %3d: ",startofsym);
getSymbol(); assertSyntax(sym == SYMName, "Name expected")
assertSyntax(syms->keysyms[res], "Unknown key name")
- int key = (int)syms->keysyms[res]-1;
+ ptrdiff_t key = (ptrdiff_t)syms->keysyms[res]-1;
//printf(" key %s (%04x)",res.latin1(),(int)syms->keysyms[res]-1);
getSymbol(); // + - :
int mode = 0;
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ Loop:
// mode name
assertSyntax(sym == SYMName, "Name expected")
assertSyntax(syms->modsyms[res], "Unknown mode name")
- int bits = (int)syms->modsyms[res]-1;
+ ptrdiff_t bits = (ptrdiff_t)syms->modsyms[res]-1;
if (mask & (1 << bits))
{
fprintf(stderr,"%s(%d,%d): mode name used multible times.\n",path.ascii(),slinno,scolno);
@@ -401,11 +401,11 @@ Loop:
getSymbol();
// string or command
assertSyntax(sym == SYMName || sym == SYMString,"Command or string expected")
- int cmd = 0;
+ ptrdiff_t cmd = 0;
if (sym == SYMName)
{
assertSyntax(syms->oprsyms[res], "Unknown operator name")
- cmd = (int)syms->oprsyms[res]-1;
+ cmd = (ptrdiff_t)syms->oprsyms[res]-1;
//printf(": do %s(%d)",res.latin1(),(int)syms->oprsyms[res]-1);
}
if (sym == SYMString)
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list