Subversion problems

[Waldo Bastian]

On Thursday 17 February 2005 10:10, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While doing more detailed experiments with subversion, we found two
> strategic problems with it:

{SNIP}

> Now I would like to have some input on the problems we face. Would you
> prefer to not loose the date<->revision mapping or doesn't it matter?

Based on the above I think we should consider to keep the CVS repository 
available for KDE < 3.5 That may even allow you to truncate the change 
history to the last 2 or 3 years when importing into SVN and throw out things 
like the KDE_1_1_BRANCH.

For new developments I don't think it's too dramatic if searching by dates 
doesn't work too well because the svn revision numbers can be used instead. 
Even for the old stuff I hardly search by dates, the KDE release number is 
usually much more useful than "June 2002".

Cheers,
Waldo
-- 
bastian at kde.org   |   Free Novell Linux Desktop 9 Evaluation Download
bastian at suse.com  |   http://www.novell.com/products/desktop/eval.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050217/7730fc64/attachment.sig>