DBUS introspection (Was: DCOP interface in kicker broke compatibility?)

[Waldo Bastian]

On Wednesday 02 February 2005 09:23, Scott Wheeler wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 February 2005 3:56, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > As ugly as it looks, I think this is the right thing to do. We should
> > break compatibility as little as possible -- not at all if possible.
> >
> > Mark the methods with // KDE4: remove
>
> What would be nice would be if there was a flag for the method that would
> prevent it from showing up in the list of DCOP methods, but still be
> possible to call.  Or at least some way of marking parts of the DCOP API as
> deprecated...though I suppose it's a bit late for such.

Something to keep in mind for the DBUS introspection format.

Cheers,
Waldo
-- 
bastian-RoXCvvDuEio at public.gmane.org   |   Free Novell Linux Desktop 9 Evaluation Download
bastian-IBi9RG/b67k at public.gmane.org  |   http://www.novell.com/products/desktop/eval.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050202/d20775ca/attachment.sig>