kconfig_compiler4

[Nicolas Goutte]

On Wednesday 28 December 2005 19:35, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> >> I'm not sure why we should be specifying the number of bits of a
> >> configuration type.
> >
> >Because it is the only sane way to store data in a machine-independant
> > type (without using text)?
>
> We use text and the only place we don't (sycoca) is machine-dependant.

Was the whole KConfig stuff not supposed to independant on what is below? So 
you could not always assume that it is text below.

Have a nice day!