Remove KProgress?

[Urs Wolfer]

No reply so far.

I don't want to do such a change without the agreement. Please comment!

Diff for Q3ProgressBar / KProgress -> QProgressBar (kdelibs).
It doesn't move KProgress to kde3support! Removes only all use of KProgress in 
kdelibs. If it's ok, I'll commit.
http://uwolfer.fwo.ch/temp/kde/qprogressbar.diff

Bye
urs

On Thursday 22 December 2005 23:46, Urs Wolfer wrote: 
> I have ported some Q3ProgressBars to QProgressBars.
>
> I think QProgressBar provides the abilities that KProgress has. So is
> KProgress still needed?
> I think we can move KProgress to kde3support. Instead of using KProgress we
> can use QProgressBar.
>
> See also this TODO entry:
> - Is KProgress still needed?  The only benefit I can see is the ability to
> set the format, but it seems like the style API should be able to handle
> that automatically.
>
> Is there an argument against that? Can I continue with this work?
>
> Bye
> urs
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20051226/1f0314f9/attachment.sig>