KDE ABI stability?

[Leo Savernik]

Am Montag, 5. Dezember 2005 20:11 schrieb Zack Rusin:
> [...] I don't
> know, we can make it the release dude responsibility or get some
> procedure in place by which when someone says "you broke bc, revert"
> and the other person goes "yeah, but it had to be done so i'm not
> reverting" someone third with authority can come in and say "you're a
> jackass, this is not up for discussion, revert right now or i will".

This situation just craves for a pre-commit tool that keeps any malicious 
commits from ever hitting rcs.

mfg
	Leo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20051205/4560811c/attachment.sig>