Can anybody confirm #104712 ?

[Goffioul Michael]

> On Friday 29 April 2005 10:58, Goffioul Michael wrote:
> > It may be the reason as the previous code was based on Qt 
> cursors. The current
> > implementation uses KCursor, but it should be swapped 
> again. Can anybody do it
> > and close bug 104712? Thanks.
> 
> Hmm this is about this code?
> marginpreview.cpp:                              
> setCursor(KCursor::sizeVerCursor());
> marginpreview.cpp:                              
> setCursor(KCursor::sizeHorCursor());
> 
> That's sizeVer/sizeHor, unrelated to splitV/splitH ... My 
> answer looks unrelated then.

Then let's go back to my original question. Can anybody confirm the bug?

Michael.