Can anybody confirm #104712 ?

[Goffioul Michael]

> On Friday 29 April 2005 10:38, Goffioul Michael wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Can anybody confirm or not bug #104712. I already swapped 
> cursors orientation
> > because it appeared to be wrong on the test box I had 
> access to. Now it looks
> > wrong again!
> 
> From KWord:
> 
>     case MEANING_RESIZE_COLUMN:
>         // Bug in Qt up to Qt-3.1.1 : Qt::splitVCursor and 
> Qt::splitHCursor are swapped!
> #if QT_VERSION <= 0x030101
>         return Qt::splitVCursor;
> #else
>         return Qt::splitHCursor;
> #endif
> 
>     case MEANING_RESIZE_ROW:
> #if QT_VERSION <= 0x030101
>         return Qt::splitHCursor;
> #else
>         return Qt::splitVCursor;
> #endif

It may be the reason as the previous code was based on Qt cursors. The current
implementation uses KCursor, but it should be swapped again. Can anybody do it
and close bug 104712? Thanks.

Michael.