SVN timing again

[Matt Rogers]

On Saturday 09 April 2005 12:54 pm, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The only thing holding SVN conversion currently is the
> fact that we can't track reliably server side moves.
>
> Me and many others aired the opinion, that we lived
> so far without tracked server side moves and won't
> miss it in the future - on the other hand it delays the
> move to subversion where we can move easily.
>
> So my question is: is there demand from kde-core-devel
> to wait more for Ossi to finish that feature or do you
> prefer to skip that and go to subversion right away.
>
> Ossi is talking about two further weeks and having seen
> the how long his original week of delay was - nah, let's
> say we're talking two weeks here. What do you think?
> Wait or move?
>
> Greetings, Stephan

Let's just freakin' move already. people are thinking anoncvs and webcvs 
downtime are related to the svn move, people are tired of being bombarded 
with questions about the move, etc. I just don't think that reliably tracking 
server side moves from the conversion is all that important.

Matt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050409/d70008f6/attachment.sig>