RFC: kdenonbeta reorganisation

[Rob Kaper]

On Tuesday 28 September 2004 9:50am, Daniel Molkentin wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28. September 2004 09:47, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> >It might be worthwhile to have the kdeplayground managed by subversion. If
> > it's moved into CVS then, you would loose history, but at least we got a
> > playground for developers to meet subversion.
>
> I for one welcome our new subversion overlord :) I'm all for it. But: can
> office still handle the load or do we need a different server for this?

If scaling KDE development creates problems with the infrastructure, a 
non-centralized model for playgrounds such as arch might be more useful. Easy 
to publish, mirror and merge and no need for overlords. :-)

Rob
-- 
Rob Kaper     | "Whoever wants to know the heart and mind of America had
cap at capsi.com | better learn baseball" -- Jacques Barzun
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20040928/d9313a12/attachment.sig>