[PATCH] XML validity of kcfg files

[Zack Rusin]

On Saturday 30 October 2004 14:59, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> Is there a valid reason for making this order mandatory, i.e. does
> changing the order change the semantics? If not, then the DTD is IMO
> too strict.

This dtd is documentation....

I'd say it doesn't work like that. But apperently the script and others 
know better :)

So let me just take the liberty as someone who wrote this damn thing and 
say what exactly it's for:
- this dtd was meant to be loose documentation for the structure of kcfg 
files while we were improving kconfig_compiler,
- it was never meant to be used a strict validator,

In order to use the dtd to validate files so strickly you need to fix 
it. 

Zack (who's starting to get very irritated by the all those clueless 
scripts and people who believe the scripts over developers)

-- 
Dream as if you'll live forever. 
Live as if you'll die tomorrow.