Fix for Bug 73461 - ok to commit?

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Tuesday 27 January 2004 18:03, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 January 2004 14:10, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> > Redistribution and processing of this message is subject to
> > http://www.arklinux.org/terms.php
>
> It would be convenient if you didn't mail kde-core-devel (or any KDE
> list) messages with this restriction until you have cleared this with
> the list administrators. In particular, condition 4:
>
> 4. You are not allowed to extract any email address from any document
> for the purpose of sending UBE, or for the purpose of distributing an
> address list to people who might use it to send UBE. Furthermore, you
> may not publish any email address found on these pages in any medium,
> unless it shares this restriction.
>
> Now that the KDE list archive has published your message as
> http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=107520901126171&w=2 without
> imposing this restriction, we appear to be in a quandary. I don't
> want to be a policy wonk. I'm sure we'll have a long pointless thread
> about this now. Ugh. But _do_ realise that either your little
> disclaimer is meaningless, or the list archiving mechanisms need to
> be totally reconsidered.

All Bernhard has to do is add a special header to his messages which 
tells the mailing list archive that his messages should not be 
archived. From http://lists.kde.org/?q=about#Privacy:
"First of all, we respect the 'x-no-archive' mail header ala DejaNews -- 
if your mail message includes a 'x-no-archive: yes' header it will be 
dropped from our feed, to respect the wishes of list members who wish 
to keep their posts private."

Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20040128/3f0efb2e/attachment.sig>