Benchmark for mmap n KConfigBackEnd, was Bug #72586
mueller at kde.org
Mon Jan 19 14:03:52 GMT 2004
On Friday 16 January 2004 23:38, Dr. Juergen Pfennig wrote:
> I did some benchmarks and unfortunatately they show no effect of using
> mmap or not (even as an ex-particle physicist I don't see a peek - I should
> probably show it to my ancient professor who saw the peeks he wanted in
> almost every data set).
Well, in theory mmap avoids a memcopy, with the multi-hundred or MB/s even
not-so-current machines can do, its normal that you don't see an effect on
files 16k with such a low-resolution timer.
There are files > 16k btw. kmailrc is a good example :)
> Is mmap() good for anything? Yes it is, if you do random walks through a
> file or if you skip portions while reading.
Thats true. since we read the memory only once, mmap's effect is very limited.
More information about the kde-core-devel