syncX(); requestShutdown() - necessary?
neundorf at kde.org
Tue Jan 6 19:24:54 GMT 2004
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 20:18, Frans Englich wrote:
> On Monday 05 January 2004 03:47, Frans Englich wrote:
> > In a couple of places in kicker syncX() is called right before
> > kapp::requestShutdown. It seemes to be in excess considering
> > requestShutdown starts with calling syncX. Is there a reason for this?
> > Anyway, attached patch removes those lines.
> ...and to your left is the bit bucket ... and to your right the cvs commit
> Silently dropping it? Never heard of such thing.
I can't comment on it.
Hopefully others ?
(sometimes changing the question helps: e.g. from "Ok to commit ?" to "It
seems there are no objections, so I'll commit" ;-)
Work: alexander.neundorf at jenoptik.com - http://www.jenoptik-los.de
Home: neundorf at kde.org - http://www.kde.org
alex at neundorf.net - http://www.neundorf.net
More information about the kde-core-devel