LD_LIBRARY_PATH not being honoured (Re: Crash on launch with no X error message)

[Michael Matz]

Hi,

On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, David Faure wrote:

> > And was bar.la depending on LIB_KBLEH?  In that case bar.la anyway has to 
> > be listed before it, so this misfeature of libtool even made you fix a 
> > different bug.  Very useful misfeature then ;-)
> 
> This is really new to me. I thought the order of the libs in
> LIBADD/LIBADD only mattered for static builds (which don't work in KDE
> anyway for many reasons).

Yes, it only matters for static buildsm which doesn't make it less a bug 
;-)

> So what's the general rule? When A depends on B, put A before B?

Yep.  Hopefully we don't have to care for circular dependencies ;)


Ciao,
Michael.