A humble packager's request: Retire kdeaddons.

[Chris Cheney]

On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 11:53:23AM +0100, David Faure wrote:
> kdesdk isn't about developing FOR kde (only), it's about developing WITH kde.
> IMHO it would be a good place for unsermake.
> 
> > And kdenonbeta, well, is a mess.  It's an annoyance to keep something that's 
> > mature there just because there's no better location.
> Yes - and it's not packaged so it requires using CVS (whereas kdesdk is available
> everywhere, so having unsermake there would make it easier for people to use
> it when compiling e.g. kde tarballs).

Having unsermake in kdesdk will cause a circular dependency if someone
wants to build kde with it, as long as kde is written to use autotools
this will be fine. But its something to keep in mind.

Chris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20040217/5a86e6df/attachment.sig>