Static functions

[Thiago Macieira]

Dirk Mueller wrote:
>On Monday 16 February 2004 15:55, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> >so your compiler can compile this?
>>
>> Sure:
>
>Please compile my example not yours which is "fixed".

Oh, that won't work because static functions have to be defined in the 
same file. You know that as well as I do and this wasn't the original 
discussion.

Maybe we got lost somewhere along the line 4 or 5 messages ago:

On Monday 16 February 2004 14:21, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> However, if you add  "static" to the namespace above, the symbol won't
> be exported, which is impossible with a class. 

I was assuming that if anyone wanted to not to export a symbol, that 
he'd also know that the symbol has to be defined in the same file.

-- 
  Thiago Macieira  -  Registered Linux user #65028
   thiago (AT) macieira (DOT) info
    ICQ UIN: 1967141   PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
    E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20040216/17de0990/attachment.sig>