Relevancy of Preferences KCM

[Frans Englich]

On Monday 16 February 2004 02:00, Russell Miller wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sunday 15 February 2004 18:56, Zack Rusin wrote:
> > Then instead of having so many things in the KControl we could export
> > the more advanced and rarely used ones as KConfig XT files which
> > kconfigeditor would use.
>
> This is what I'm talking about :)  I don't mind this at all.  Give me a way
> to tweak what I want to, even if it's in a catch-all, and I'm happy.
>
> Just don't go removing stuff.  That annoys me.

Removing stuff which people need is a big no no. But lessen the amount of 
stuff really makes things easier - it makes organization easier, no doubt I 
would say. (so it is of interest to make the amount of options in KControl 
smaller).
What would people think if a kcfg file were there instead?  George?

Cheers,

		Frans