[OT] some weird GPL licensing questions

[Kurt Pfeifle]

Andras Mantia wrote:

> Kurt Pfeifle wrote: 


>and in another mail you wrote:
> 
> 
>>Of course, if you offer the binary versions for public,
>>anonymous download, you need to offer the sources the same way.
> 
> 
> Now I don't understand you. :-) I told exactly the same,

In that case I misunderstood you.

> but regarding to a
> web page, not anonymous download. Let's say what the GPL FAQ
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.htm) (says, and I trust them, as that
> one was written to clarify the GPL and by those who created the GPL. Of
> course the FAQ itself is not a legal document, but I believe the FSF
> lawyers would act in the spirit of that.
> 


[...]

Thanks for clarifying this also.

Cheers,
Kurt