KIO->GnomeVFS bridge started (looking for a Common-VFS)

[Leo Savernik]

Am Dienstag, 21. Dezember 2004 19:49 schrieb Jason Keirstead:
> > I think using KIOSlave code inside Gnome-VFS is definitely a good idea.
> > But i would not use them as they are, but rather write a C++ porting
> > layer on top of the Gnome-VFS modules concept which almost acts like the
> > SlaveBase class, but without Qt stuff inside. Porting them should be
> > possible, because the Qt bindings of io-slaves are not very strong.
>
> Why would you want take the existing KDE code, write a porting layer, and
> move it to GVFS? (and then, I assume, port KIO to use GVFS?) All you are
> doing is introducing additional code paths and potential bugs in the
> slaves.

Heh. This reminds me of the discussion to make Qt being based on gtk2 for 
drawing and event handling. First I thought the guy was making a joke, but in 
the course of the discussion I realised he was dead serious.

Luckily, no coding was ever done on that attempt :-)

mfg
 Leo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20041221/34f7fba4/attachment.sig>