KIO->GnomeVFS bridge started (looking for a Common-VFS)

[Benjamin Meyer]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 20 December 2004 7:37 am, Jason Keirstead wrote:
> On Sunday 19 December 2004 8:44 am, nf wrote:
> > * of course gvfs-kio should handle ftp:, http: and smb: (not gftp:,
> > ghttp:, gsmb:...). How could that be achieved? What happens in KIO when
> > you install two .protocol files which offer the same protocol. Could
> > there be a kind of "priority" order key, which tells KIO which one to
> > choose if there are two.
>
> I would think that it should try to find a KIO slave first, and fall back
> on GVFS if absent. In a similar vein, if such a bridge were also written to
> use KIO slaves in Gnome, I would expect they would prefer the GVFS slaves
> and fall back on ours.
>
> Why would anyone would want a KDE application to prefer a GVFS slave over a
> KIO one?

The KDE one works better?  Looking from the user perspective I would always 
want the one that is fully featured, bug free rather then the one that isn't 
as good, be it kde or gnome.

- -Benjamin Meyer

- -- 
aka icefox
Public Key: http://www.icefox.net/public_key.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBxs1y1rZ3LTw38vIRAqAIAKC20gPl7BFYQTgeERUygeYy2j5QRQCghmV7
Myo5U2iGm3cykF/VheAixEg=
=9uTl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----