Proposal for KDE 4.0

[Carsten Wolff]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 18 August 2004 18:14, Leo Savernik wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 18 August 2004 15:45 schrieb Richard Smith:
> [...]
>
> > The FHS says:
> >
> > "Large software packages must not use a direct subdirectory under the
> > /usr hierarchy."
> >
> > That seems pretty clear to me. But more to the point: why would you want
> > to have a /usr/kde4?
>
> Right. Hence, let's stick to /opt/kde4.

What's "stick" and "traditional" (some other post) supposed to mean? In 5 
years I never had a /opt/kdeX directory and configure defaults 
to /usr/local/kde. /opt only was a decision of some distributors, there's 
nothing to stick to.

Cheers,
Carsten

- -- 
THE K Desktop Environment:  http://www.kde.org  mailto:wolff at kde.org
My very own little site  :  http://www.wolffcarsten.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBI4lh8elb1gg1f/QRAoBuAKDIBh7bpCJmEeOjgJFytVmjBPUt6QCfWuOp
lJUKAJ6sknb9h+a4XdgauZw=
=S1bY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----