[PATCH] bug #53345 - startkde

Daniel Stone daniel at fooishbar.org
Sat Sep 20 02:26:29 BST 2003


On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 01:10:43AM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 09:01:44PM +0200, Martin Konold wrote:
> > di[d] you check how startup time is affected on low end machines?
> > 
> i'd classify my cely @500 a low-end machine today. :)

Buarrrrr, not really. For developers, sure - quite slow. For users, not
necessarily. If you're going to do "slow" testing, please try a
mid-to-high-range Pentium, or a low-range Pentium II. Seriously, a Celery 500 is
certainly not "low-end" - only to developers. This sort of thinking seems to be
somewhat rampant. :(

-- 
Daniel Stone                                              <daniel at fooishbar.org>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"Configurability is always the best choice when it's pretty simple to implement"
  -- Havoc Pennington, gnome-list
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20030920/d1409780/attachment.sig>


More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list