RFC: KConfig XT (KDE 3.2)

Neil Stevens neil at qualityassistant.com
Mon Mar 17 05:07:42 GMT 2003


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday March 16, 2003 08:38, Daniel Stone wrote:
> You've utterly missed the point - mine, KConfig XT's, and this entire
> thread's.

No I didn't miss where Waldo's "goals" list talks about defaults.  I didn't 
miss all the work Waldo and others have done on the "kiosk" system 
administration.  I didn't miss where the author of KConfEdit seems to 
agree that it's meant for system administrators.

I will grant you that I've missed your point.  Is it that feel defaults 
hard-coded in source files are good?  Is it that you think anyone who 
deserves the title system administrator ought to be forced to configure 
his system's KDE with vi rather than a graphical tool?  Are you confused 
between this thread and the one talking about a database backend to 
KConfig?

- -- 
Neil Stevens - neil at qualityassistant.com
"The shepherd drives the wolf from the sheep's throat, for which the
sheep thanks the shepherd as a liberator, while the wolf denounces him
for the same act as the destroyer of liberty." -- Abraham Lincoln
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+dVgef7mnligQOmERAtFTAJ4kXi4hUsYiJJRZYTs2Egut8YfxQwCeMMw3
gptg65aBta8CAniXrc+2CkA=
=wtpP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list