About the clock...

Ingo Klöcker kloecker at kde.org
Mon Jun 30 21:51:30 BST 2003

On Monday 30 June 2003 07:26, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Monday 2003 June 30 02:39, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > On Friday 27 June 2003 14:29, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > > And I think the problem will be present in case of
> > > larger networks with different KDE version (3.0, 3.1, 3.2) on
> > > them, but sharing the same config dir and depending on which one
> > > you will log in, the clock will be different.
> >
> > So far all versions of KMail made incompatible changes to it's
> > config files. So using KMail from different KDE version with the
> > same config dir is dangerous (e. g. you risk loosing all
> > identities). If you want to keep going back to older KDE versions
> > then use separate $KDEHOMEs.
> Sincerely, I never noticed it. I use 3.1 on my laptop and the config
> files were copied from the CVS HEAD there, and it worked without
> problem. So did KMail when CVS HEAD didn't want to start due to the
> kbuildsyscoca crashes some days ago.

Well, since 3.1 we didn't make any incompatible changes. So it's not 
surprising that using the CVS HEAD config file with 3.1 currently 
works. But before 3.2 is released we will have to change the way the 
folder information is stored in the config file.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 192 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20030630/b1c959dd/attachment.sig>

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list