KDE 3.2 release plan =?iso-8859-1?q?notice

[Luis Pedro Coelho]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Le Sunday 15 June 2003 22:20, Martijn Klingens a écrit :
> That was more a sidenote. The main question is if we can rename RC1 to
> Final Beta and release all RCs whenever there are no known showstoppers
> instead of looking at something as arbitrary as a calendar date.

I agree. 

Don't call a release candidate something which isn't a release candidate. 

Aside from translation fixes (which one can say are "safe"), there should be 
the zero forseenable changes between the final release candidate and the 
release itself.

Otherwise, call them BETA releseas or GAMMA releases (i have never seen anyone 
use this, but it is the letter that follows beta, IIRC).

regards,
- -- 
Luis Pedro Coelho

On user interfaces and languages, see:
http://luispedro.journalspace.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+7Ni6GpBAvyRwXdgRArOgAKCSTqJHQoVnRMk29uM+YGTTliO57ACgya/R
vfhVlB62wex8CT8t+tDAxxM=
=soQZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----