Stability in HEAD?

[Bernhard Reiter]

On Monday 28 July 2003 11:49, Chris Howells wrote:

> On Monday 28 July 2003 10:46, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> > Naturally some people want to play with new stuff, that is perfectly
> > fine. Others want to keep stuff stable, that's also a worthwhile  goal.
>
> We're talking about CVS HEAD here. HEAD is not stable. That's the point.

I wasn't the point I was arguing, though.
Even in HEAD stability does not have a uniform quality.
I'm proposing to have different definitions and criteria 
for core parts and application parts. 

QT is a core part. The criteria to make a special
version a requirement or just recommended 
should be made from the KDE libraries perspective.

Building applications should actually only happen on KDE libraries
declared "stable" enough.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2145 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20030730/4480549e/attachment.bin>