non-KDE CVS apps in bugs.k.o

[Daniel Stone]

On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 10:08:34AM -0400, Maksim Orlovich wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > hi...
> > 
> > going through b.k.o  i've noticed that there are a few apps listed there that 
> > aren't in KDE's CVS. while i have no real objection with this, per say, i was 
> > just curious as to whether or not this was desireable?
> 
> There is also the related issue of the "binaries" package, which contains
> at least 6 reports we're entirely not responsible for, in accordance to 
> the package policy. Most of those seem like they belong in the Debian bug
> system...

I've smacked down all the Debian bugs - one filed in the Debian BTS,
another WORKSFORME, and a couple of others INVALID. Dunno what to do
about the OpenPKG request, however.

-- 
Daniel Stone                                              <daniel at fooishbar.org>
http://www.kde.org - http://www.debian.org - http://www.xwin.org
"Configurability is always the best choice when it's pretty simple to implement"
  -- Havoc Pennington, gnome-list
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20030708/54c27e7c/attachment.sig>