[PATCH] Re: What not to be doing - syscall()

[Frans Englich]

On Tuesday 23 December 2003 20:53, Frans Englich wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 December 2003 11:56, Frans Englich wrote:

I can't believe I argued against KMail's have-you-attached-a-patch feature ;-)


			Frans



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: getlogin.koffice.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1117 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20031223/6c2a713a/attachment.diff>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: getlogin.kdelibs.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 2210 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20031223/6c2a713a/attachment-0001.diff>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: getlogin.kdebase.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 991 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20031223/6c2a713a/attachment-0002.diff>