Reason for -no-stl in qt-copy configure recommendation?

[Alexander Kellett]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 03:37:33PM +0200, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> On Thursday 24 April 2003 14:56, George Staikos wrote:
> >   I don't think this is a good idea.  I foresee much more STL use as
> > opposed to Qt use, for one.
> 
> I very much doubt that. For one thing the STL is generally harder to use than 
> the Qt classes. But most of all there's no widely avaiable good documentation 
> about it (the SGI pages are rather crude). You'll have a hard time using it 
> without a good book on the subject.

which is why imo it should certainly not be a used and
without a doubt not be a cause for me to recompile the
codebase... its gonna be a while before i have time to so
bye bye to kde work for a couple of works...

Alex