Reason for -no-stl in qt-copy configure recommendation?
Stephan Kulow
coolo at kde.org
Thu Apr 24 10:51:13 BST 2003
On Thursday 24 April 2003 11:23, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> ( Lighter? Hehe. Which of those typedefs and inline methods exactly should
> make the STL support so heavyweight? ;) ).
I don't know how you define weight, but they surely inrease parsing time needed by
the compiler.
>
> Why should be there anything wrong with requiring STL support in Qt? Just
> because TrollTech supports every Nulix-0.1 doesn't mean we should too. I
> thought it was ok to use standard C++ libs by now? And, since IIRC I saw some
> of those warnings about obsolete C++ headers, it seems we already do use them
> anyway.
I didn't object to the requirement, I was just pointing out that Marc wasn't speaking
about a recommendation but about a requirement.
Greetings, Stephan
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list