Is this still binary compatible?
Willy De la Court
Willy.DelaCourt at pandora.be
Tue Apr 1 00:38:37 BST 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 01:22, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Die, 01 Apr 2003, Willy De la Court wrote:
>
> Answer the question yourself:
>
> http://developer.kde.org/documentation/library/kdeqt/kde3arch/devel-binaryc
>ompatibility.html
Yeah i read that three times
the thing about the order bugs me say i have this
virtual a
virtual b
and i change it to
virtual a
void c
virtual b
does this alter the order of the virtual functions?
Well they are in the same order still.
Should i just add the new stuff to the end instead of somewhere in the middle?
- --
Simple things make people happy.
Willy De la Court
PGP Public Key at http://www.linux-lovers.be/download/public_key.asc
PGP Key fingerprint = 784E E18F 7F85 9C7C AC1A D5FB FE08 686C 37C7 A689
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+iNF9/ghobDfHpokRAtAuAKDDfYsIZ6WJynv4/VRRaItd8NGRZQCfaJKp
akxIkibYOiSiqnFcxyQ+11s=
=Tur2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list