Qt 3.1 or 3.0 for HEAD? (was: NAG: kshortcut.cpp ...)

Adriaan de Groot adridg at sci.kun.nl
Mon Sep 23 14:28:32 BST 2002

Hi Ellis,

On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Ellis Whitehead wrote:
> On Monday 23 September 2002 09:27, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> > On Sunday 22 September 2002 23:39, Alfons Hoogervorst wrote:
> > > CVS HEAD compilation fails in kshortcut.cpp. Does this imply I have to
> > > switch to qt-copy HEAD?
> >
> > For CVS HEAD you need Qt 3.0.4 at least, according to
> > 	http://developer.kde.org/build/compile_cvs.html
> I committed changes to kshortcut.cpp yesterday which are based on qt-copy.  I
> presume that whatever is in qt-copy is permissible to use.  If this isn't the
> case, please let me know and I'll revert the patch.

That's big of you. You can see on the list that quite a few people are
bumping into this right now, since they're used to building HEAD with
older Qt's and you're apparently the first to use some of the really new

The FreeBSD team is wrestling with it because it seems that all of us and
our build farm are on Qt's varying from 3.0.3 to 3.0.5.

Anyway, I seem to recall a discussion a week or two back where this same
subject cropped up and that the consensus was that it'd be cool if Qt 3.1
came out in time to match the KDE 3.1 version number, but that we'd
otherwise use 3.0.5. Let's wait for some release-dude type person to speak
up on this as to his or her intentions.

+ Adriaan de Groot             + Project: FRESCoS                           +
+ adridg at cs.kun.nl             + Private: adridg at sci.kun.nl                 +
+ Kamer A6020 tel. 024 3652272 + http://www.cs.kun.nl/~adridg/frescos/      +

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list