sanders at kde.org
Tue Sep 17 08:04:46 BST 2002
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 16:43, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> Let me clarify this a bit. You are in a dispute over the
> maintainership of kmail and you latest CVS commits seems to be an
> attempt to force a verdict in this matter from the larger KDE
> Based on the information that has been presented to me over the
> last few weeks you have been the maintainer for KMail for a
> significant period. However, for all practical matters, Michael
> Häckel has been the maintainer for the last year or so. I do not
> have the impression that anyone other than you disputed Michael's
> role as current maintainer.
Current maintainer is not the most important concept to me. But I will
discuss that later.
> You can consider the temporary suspension of your CVS access a
> preliminary verdict by me in this matter.
Cool. But does this means you are not going to let me commit to
make_it_cool or other KDE packages while this KMail HEAD case is in
I have other more important things I want to work on besides this
issue of maintainership.
I suggest that both you
> and Michael present your case in one single mail to the members of
> this mailinglist and then the members of this list can voice their
> opinion in this matter.
Ok, I'll work on that mail tonight and send it by tomorrow. But I
would like both mails to be sent to you in private and once you have
received both of them then you should post them to the list.
> Hopefully that leads to some sort of rough
> concensus, and if so, then I consider that to be binding.
Ok, a jury by my peers that's what I wanted.
> Alternatively, you can work out an amicable agreement with Michael.
I have attempted to do this in private mail with no success. I guess I
should attach those mails. There are a number of private mails sent
between Michael and myself does Michael (or Marc of khz) object to me
including those mails?
More information about the kde-core-devel